All of us are lovers of great books, right? I wonder if most of my readers also love great films, as I do...
It only stands to reason that the book, as the source of inspiration, will be better. It also stands to reason that a book is envisioned differently by every reader and, therefore, a movie adaptation will not please everyone.
Can you think of a film adaptation that you enjoyed more than the book? In such a case did you actually read the book first or did you perhaps see the film first?
I can think of two instances in which I loved the film and didn't care so much for the book. In both instances, however, I saw
the films first and later read the books. I do wonder if that has skewed my perception in each case. The titles are: Mary Poppins by P. L. Travers and The Princess Bride by William Goldman. I feel that both films are classics. I am not convinced that I'd have seen the treasure in either book; we are fortunate that someone did.
Here is an interesting article about someone else's feelings on the idea that the books is always better than the movie.
So...what do you think? Can you name any instances where you enjoyed the film more?